Perbandingan Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Negeri 3 Lengayang

Penulis

  • Antoni Rahman Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, STKIP Pesisir Selatan
  • Yanti Nazmai Eka Putri Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, STKIP Pesisir Selatan
  • Ratna Mayang Sari Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, STKIP Pesisir Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60041/algebra.v2i1.381

Abstrak

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa kelas VII di SMP Negeri 3 Lengayang berdasarkan kelas VII A dan VII B. Literasi matematika merupakan kemampuan individu dalam merumuskan, menerapkan, dan menafsirkan matematika dalam berbagai konteks kehidupan sehari-hari. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif komparatif. Instrumen penelitian berupa tes literasi matematika berbentuk soal uraian kontekstual yang disusun berdasarkan indikator literasi matematika Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan uji-t dua sampel independen. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata kemampuan literasi matematika siswa kelas VII A lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas VII B. Uji-t menunjukkan nilai t hitung lebih besar daripada t tabel pada taraf signifikansi 0,05 sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan kemampuan literasi matematika antara siswa kelas VII A dan VII B di SMP Negeri 3 Lengayang.

Kata kunci: literasi matematika, analisis perbandingan, uji-t, siswa SMP

Referensi

Erer, S., Hadjar, A., & Backes, S. (2025). School mechanisms behind achievement differences: A systematic review of multilevel modelling studies in primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 131, 102572–102572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102572

Kappassova, S., Abylkassymova, A., Bulut, U., Zykrina, S., Zhumagulova, Z., & Balta, N. (2025). Mathematical literacy and its influencing factors: A decade of research findings (2015–2024). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16615

Knabbe, A., Leiss, D., & Ehmke, T. (2025). Reality-based tasks with complex-situations: Identifying sociodemographic and cognitive factors for solution. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10463-5

Komarudin, K., Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2024). The RMS teaching model with brainstorming technique and student digital literacy as predictors of mathematical literacy. Heliyon, 10(13), e33877–e33877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33877

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

OECD. (2023b). The State of Learning and Equity in Education. PISA.

Pratama, R. A., & Yelken, T. Y. (2024). Effectiveness of ethnomathematics-based learning on students’ mathematical literacy: A meta-analysis study. Discover Education, 3, 202–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00309-1

Risdiyanti, I., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2024). Mathematical literacy learning environment for inclusive education teachers: A framework. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1003–1026. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp1003-1026

Thanheiser, E., & Melhuish, K. (2023). Teaching routines and student-centered mathematics instruction: The essential role of conferring to understand student thinking and reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, 101032–101032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101032

Diterbitkan

2025-06-28