PENGGUNAAN RADEC LEARNING DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SEJARAH: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Rikza Fauzan; Nashar; Wulan Nurjanah

doi:10.60041/jap.v4i1.256

Authors

Rikza Fauzan
Nashar Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa
Wulan Nurjanah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60041/jap.v4i1.256

Keywords:

RADEC, pembelajaran sejarah, systematic literature review, efektivitas pembelajaran

Abstract

The RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, Create) learning model was developed as a learning approach that emphasises active student engagement through explicit and systematic stages. This study aims to examine the use of the RADEC learning model in history education through a systematic literature review (SLR) approach. Data were obtained from Google Scholar using the Publish or Perish application with the keyword ‘RADEC’ and limited to publications from 2015 to 2025. Of the 100 articles collected, only 9 were relevant to the topic of history learning, and after selection based on inclusion criteria, only one article met the analysis requirements. The article demonstrated that the application of RADEC significantly improved students' learning outcomes in the subject of Islamic Cultural History. The findings also highlighted challenges in implementing RADEC, such as low student reading interest and insufficient teacher readiness. However, the simple and contextual syntax of RADEC makes it relevant and effective for implementation. This study concludes that although research is still limited, the RADEC model has great potential in supporting active history learning oriented towards 21st-century skills. Further research is recommended to expand the understanding and implementation of RADEC in the context of history at various levels of education.

Keywords: RADEC, history learning, systematic literature review, learning effectiveness

References

Andriyani, F., & Ekawati, R. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Model Pembelajaran RADEC terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa: Systematic Literature Review. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 8(3).

Atika, M., Sayekti R. (2023). Studi Literatur Review Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan Berbasis Artificial Intelligance (AI). Palimpsest: Jurnal Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan, 14(1), 39–52.

Bolisani, E., Bratianu, C. (2018). The elusive definition of knowledge. Emergent knowledge strategies: Strategic thinking in knowledge management, 1-22.

di Sekolah, M. M. P. R. (2022). Dasar: Systematic Literature Review. learning, 2, 11-2022.

Donthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on Business and Research. Journal of Business Research 117, 284–289 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2628-0

Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. and Davarzani, H. (2015). Green Supply Chain Management: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 162, pp.101 114, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003

Fink, A. (2005). Conducting Research Literature Reviews. From the Internet to Paper, 4th ed., SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.

García-Feijoo, M., Eizaguirre, A., & Rica-Aspiunza, A. (2020). Systematic review of sustainable-developmentgoal deployment in business schools. Sustainability, 12(1), 440.

Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2015). Lean And Green – A Systematic Review of The State of The Art Literature’, Journal of Cleaner Production, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064

Hadi, S., Tjahjono, H. K., & Palupi, M. (2020). Systematic Review: Meta Sintesis Untuk Riset Perilaku Organisasional. Sleman: Viva Victory Abadi.

Heersmink, R., Hoven, J., Van Den, E., Van Den, N.J. and Berg, J. (2010) Bibliometric Mapping of Computer and Information Ethics. Ethics Inf Technol (2011) 13 pp 241- 249 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7

Higgins, J. P. et al. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj, 343.

iqbal Nurfauzan, M., & Faizatunnisa, H. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Trend Penelitian Covid- 19 Di Indonesia Pada Bidang Bisnis Dan Manajemen. Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 30(2), 90- 100.

Iwanda, C. N. S. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Radec Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam Siswa MTS Pembangunan UIN Jakarta (Bachelor's thesis).

Pratama, Y. A., Sopandi, W., Hidayah, Y., & Trihatusti, M. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran RADEC terhadap keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sekolah dasar. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(2), 191-203.

Satria, E., & Sopandi, W. (2019, October). Applying RADEC model in science learning to promoting students’ critical thinking in elementary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1321, No. 3, p. 032102). IOP Publishing.

Sopandi, W. (2023). Model Pembelajaran RADEC (Teori dan Implementasi di Sekolah). Upi Press.

Suryana, S. I., Sopandi, W., Sujana, A., & Pramswari, L. P. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran RADEC. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 225-232.

Tinanbunan, D. S., Zulhajjah, Z., Mufidah, A., & Rahayu, P. (2024). Upaya Mahasiswa Stain Madina Dalam Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Radec (Read-Answer–Disscuss- Explain-And Create) Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Man 3 Mandailing Natal. Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 12-24.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003). Towards A Methodology For Developing Evidenceinformed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, Vol. 14, Nos. 1–3, pp.207–222 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 8551.00375

Yulianti, D., Salim, T. A., & Wibowo, M. P. (2023). Sejarah lisan sebagai teknik preservasi pengetahuan: Systematic literature review [Oral history as a knowledge preservation technique: A systematic literature review]. Palimpsest: Jurnal Ilmu Informasi dan sPerpustakaan, 14(2), 145-155.

Yulianti, Y., Lestari, H., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). Penerapan model pembelajaran RADEC terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8(1), 47-56.